Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/15/06 16:47
Read: times


 
#112249 - Well, I didn't visit the link, but ...
Responding to: ???'s previous message
It would surprise me to see that they would admit that their goal is to supplant the 805x core in the marketplace. That would be too honest and straightforward. Nonetheless, you can bet that's what they're telling their investors.

There are quite a few things that an ARM can't do as cost-effectively as an 805x. It looks to me as though they'd simply like to own the "best" tool suite as the 805x becomes more popular as an IP core in addition to its many variants on the silicon market.

There have been several attempts to publish reverse-engineered free-IP of the ARM core, which have been resisted vigorously by the ARM legal team. I'm not sure how it will turn out, but it's likely to have profound impact on the IP market. For now, they're just protecting their product. It will have far-reaching consequence, though, if they can prevent a person who has never seen the actual ARM sources from publishing an equivalent IP core of his own creation.

RE


List of 35 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
ARM Dumps Keil Compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
   Not a good week.            01/01/70 00:00      
      Hmmm ....            01/01/70 00:00      
   Prediction            01/01/70 00:00      
      Dumping            01/01/70 00:00      
         Are you sure?            01/01/70 00:00      
            well, what is what            01/01/70 00:00      
               conversion path            01/01/70 00:00      
                  new owners, new policies            01/01/70 00:00      
                     bad news for 8051core user            01/01/70 00:00      
                        not really            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Then, why don't folks already use those?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              stated aim            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Well, we mustn't forget            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Competitor?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 That's quite so            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    blatantly stolen from the Keil forum            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       That could appear to be so, but it's not            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Richard, nothing about you            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Well, I didn't visit the link, but ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                well, if you had, you would have read:            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Yes, I probably would have            01/01/70 00:00      
      Java            01/01/70 00:00      
         Interesting            01/01/70 00:00      
            24-bit I2S DACs?            01/01/70 00:00      
               What's that?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I2S DAC            01/01/70 00:00      
                     What? You mean like a linear codec?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        jusr curious            01/01/70 00:00      
                           nothing            01/01/70 00:00      
                              well ... you can use my email            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 OK and see this too            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    "protected" e-mail            01/01/70 00:00      
                        "linear codec" ??            01/01/70 00:00      
                           The most common ones aren't linear            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List