Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
02/10/06 20:19
Read: times


 		 #109742 - Are you sure?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Erik Malund said:
ARM Dumps Keil Compiler
1) there is no Keil ARM compiler, only a slightly modified GCC

Are you sure?

As I understood it, Keil supported a GCC compiler, and also had their own ARM Compiler - called "CARM" (like "C51", "C166", etc).

It's the CARM that's been dumped

2) Keil does not actually "dump" the ARM ompiler, they come out with a "new and flashy model".

I don't think it's just a "new and flashy model"; I think it's a different compiler - and Keil's original CARM has been sidelined as a "Legacy" tool.

See: http://www.keil.com/arm/
Keil/ARM said:
  • Choose the RealView Compilation Tools if your goal is to use the industry-standard development tools from ARM.
  • Choose the Keil CARM C Compiler if your goal is maintain projects created with the legacy Keil compilation tools.
  • Choose the FREE GNU Compiler if your goal is to reduce development tools cost.
    • (my emphasis)

    Wasn't "Realview" ARM's own toolset?
    http://www.arm.com/products/DevTools/

    See also: http://www.keil.com/demo/limits.asp where CARM, GNU, and Realview are all mentioned distinctly.


    They're not just saying "this is the next version of CARM" - they're saying "CARM is obsolete - the new product is Realview"


    List of 35 messages in thread
    TopicAuthorDate
    ARM Dumps Keil Compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
       Not a good week.            01/01/70 00:00      
          Hmmm ....            01/01/70 00:00      
       Prediction            01/01/70 00:00      
          Dumping            01/01/70 00:00      
             Are you sure?            01/01/70 00:00      
                well, what is what            01/01/70 00:00      
                   conversion path            01/01/70 00:00      
                      new owners, new policies            01/01/70 00:00      
                         bad news for 8051core user            01/01/70 00:00      
                            not really            01/01/70 00:00      
                               Then, why don't folks already use those?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                  stated aim            01/01/70 00:00      
                                     Well, we mustn't forget            01/01/70 00:00      
                                  Competitor?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                     That's quite so            01/01/70 00:00      
                                        blatantly stolen from the Keil forum            01/01/70 00:00      
                                           That could appear to be so, but it's not            01/01/70 00:00      
                                              Richard, nothing about you            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                 Well, I didn't visit the link, but ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                    well, if you had, you would have read:            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                       Yes, I probably would have            01/01/70 00:00      
          Java            01/01/70 00:00      
             Interesting            01/01/70 00:00      
                24-bit I2S DACs?            01/01/70 00:00      
                   What's that?            01/01/70 00:00      
                      I2S DAC            01/01/70 00:00      
                         What? You mean like a linear codec?            01/01/70 00:00      
                            jusr curious            01/01/70 00:00      
                               nothing            01/01/70 00:00      
                                  well ... you can use my email            01/01/70 00:00      
                                     OK and see this too            01/01/70 00:00      
                                        "protected" e-mail            01/01/70 00:00      
                            "linear codec" ??            01/01/70 00:00      
                               The most common ones aren't linear            01/01/70 00:00      

    Back to Subject List