Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
02/10/06 20:48
Read: times


 		 #109750 - conversion path
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Erik Malund said:
The point i tried to make was that if Keil provides a smooth and easy conversion path as they have done in the past, where id the problem?

That would be true.

But it doesn't really sound like it from their own website - it sounds like they've sidelined their original compiler, and are now Pushing ARM's own tools instead:
Keil/ARM said:
  • Choose the RealView Compilation Tools if your goal is to use the industry-standard development tools from ARM.

  • Choose the Keil CARM C Compiler if your goal is maintain projects created with the legacy Keil compilation tools.
    • (my emphasis)

    Why would there be a choice between CARM and Realview if the migration were smooth and easy...?





    List of 35 messages in thread
    TopicAuthorDate
    ARM Dumps Keil Compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
       Not a good week.            01/01/70 00:00      
          Hmmm ....            01/01/70 00:00      
       Prediction            01/01/70 00:00      
          Dumping            01/01/70 00:00      
             Are you sure?            01/01/70 00:00      
                well, what is what            01/01/70 00:00      
                   conversion path            01/01/70 00:00      
                      new owners, new policies            01/01/70 00:00      
                         bad news for 8051core user            01/01/70 00:00      
                            not really            01/01/70 00:00      
                               Then, why don't folks already use those?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                  stated aim            01/01/70 00:00      
                                     Well, we mustn't forget            01/01/70 00:00      
                                  Competitor?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                     That's quite so            01/01/70 00:00      
                                        blatantly stolen from the Keil forum            01/01/70 00:00      
                                           That could appear to be so, but it's not            01/01/70 00:00      
                                              Richard, nothing about you            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                 Well, I didn't visit the link, but ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                    well, if you had, you would have read:            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                       Yes, I probably would have            01/01/70 00:00      
          Java            01/01/70 00:00      
             Interesting            01/01/70 00:00      
                24-bit I2S DACs?            01/01/70 00:00      
                   What's that?            01/01/70 00:00      
                      I2S DAC            01/01/70 00:00      
                         What? You mean like a linear codec?            01/01/70 00:00      
                            jusr curious            01/01/70 00:00      
                               nothing            01/01/70 00:00      
                                  well ... you can use my email            01/01/70 00:00      
                                     OK and see this too            01/01/70 00:00      
                                        "protected" e-mail            01/01/70 00:00      
                            "linear codec" ??            01/01/70 00:00      
                               The most common ones aren't linear            01/01/70 00:00      

    Back to Subject List