| ??? 09/22/05 13:32 Read: times |
#101386 - Response Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
I recall a case where I illustrated a point in pseudo code and immediately a post appeared "can you show that inh C" In which case I would recommend the response I used before 'If I write the code, all you will learn is how well I write code.' Ian |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Raw rookies, how to treat | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| structured links | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| which a RAW rookie rarely is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How about this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's not the "raw rookie" bit... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Define who WE are! Names only please. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| to "respond with names only" I give you | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| We've (sic) been here before | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I usually not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NFI | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| An example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Like this, then? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Andy PLEASE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| He changed his tune... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ...and what did he do with it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no, it is not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You call that progress? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Very true | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bible trouble | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Silence | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Chat Board !! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Young Wipper Snappers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| welcome worn out? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| (non)8051 stuff | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Better than 8051?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I gladly would | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Off-topic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Irony | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Irony! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Proper Subject | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| using timer for 24h | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| start a new thread | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
a minor correction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| nothing new under the sun | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not new | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I recall a case | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Response | 01/01/70 00:00 |