??? 09/02/05 17:06 Read: times |
#100474 - Raw rookies, how to treat |
Does anyone think that we should "help" a raw rookie that show absolutely no understanding of what this is all about by fixing his/her so called "code".
I think not because anyone starting off without knowing the elementary basics will get into a operational mode that is a true disaster. I think in such cases the only way to repond is "read this (give links), THEN do the best you can and come back". Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Raw rookies, how to treat | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
structured links | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
which a RAW rookie rarely is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How about this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's not the "raw rookie" bit... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Define who WE are! Names only please. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
to "respond with names only" I give you | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
We've (sic) been here before | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I usually not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
NFI | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
An example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Like this, then? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Andy PLEASE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
He changed his tune... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
...and what did he do with it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no, it is not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You call that progress? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Very true | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
bible trouble | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Silence | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Chat Board !! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Young Wipper Snappers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
welcome worn out? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
(non)8051 stuff | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Better than 8051?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I gladly would | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Off-topic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Irony | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Irony! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Proper Subject | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
using timer for 24h | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
start a new thread | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
a minor correction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
nothing new under the sun | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not new | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I recall a case | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Response | 01/01/70 00:00 |