Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
02/21/12 15:18
Read: times


 
#186107 - have you considered a "rate multiplier"?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Back in the days of "family logic," there were a few devices to which one referred as "rate multipliers," which took a high frequency clock and divided it appropriately, based on its configuration, to produce a lower frequency at ratios not commonly available with programmable counters.

You could, since your desired output frequency is extremely low, accomplish this in firmware, provided you're willing to make the required compromises in frequency precision.

As Kai has already pointed out, a PLL gives you a much better opportunity to produce what you want, and, with the aid of your MCU, you can ensure that your stability and precision are as good as they can be.

I'm not sure what you mean by "boring". There are several very low-cost CMOS frequency synthesizer IC's that would do precisely what you want with only one IC. Even the old-reliable CMOS CD4046 could, with the aid of a counter, produce a frequency output in the range you want, to excellent precision.

I'd suggest you start with Google search on "frequency multiplier". That's what I did, as I couldn't remember the device number. Keep in mind, too, that if the output symmetry doesn't meet your requirements, you can double the frequency and then divide it by two in firmware to create a perfect square wave.

RE


List of 52 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
frequency multiplier x 10            01/01/70 00:00      
   You need some specs first.            01/01/70 00:00      
      and even more questions for your tutor            01/01/70 00:00      
   Analog solution...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Input wave form            01/01/70 00:00      
      Too Bad...            01/01/70 00:00      
   have you considered a "rate multiplier"?            01/01/70 00:00      
   PCA?            01/01/70 00:00      
      PCA Yes            01/01/70 00:00      
   Update            01/01/70 00:00      
      2 i.c.s plus 6 R, C            01/01/70 00:00      
      4046 / 7490            01/01/70 00:00      
      I put my bet in the digital solution            01/01/70 00:00      
         digital solution            01/01/70 00:00      
            MCU / CPLD            01/01/70 00:00      
            Simple digital solution...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Engine too fast            01/01/70 00:00      
                  it could be made simpler            01/01/70 00:00      
                     cute            01/01/70 00:00      
               OR            01/01/70 00:00      
   Frequency Multipiler            01/01/70 00:00      
      Motivation?            01/01/70 00:00      
         Motivation ?????????            01/01/70 00:00      
            Motives            01/01/70 00:00      
               OK            01/01/70 00:00      
                  motivation guess            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I had the same feeling...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        and if you looked at any of his previous posts ...            01/01/70 00:00      
   A number of thins concern me ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      answers            01/01/70 00:00      
      Boring...            01/01/70 00:00      
         And in this case...            01/01/70 00:00      
            Yes ... but ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Making what you need, from what you can get..            01/01/70 00:00      
                  slogans            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Is that what the display needs?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     10-700 Hz is expected output frequency - not input frequency            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I did make one mistake            01/01/70 00:00      
                           old rpm analog (or digital) display is what they have            01/01/70 00:00      
                              bursts...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 See LM2917 for ancient tacho examples            01/01/70 00:00      
   PLL            01/01/70 00:00      
   More detail?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Yes, more details, please...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Details            01/01/70 00:00      
            This can have to do ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               sharp edges            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Which phase-detector?            01/01/70 00:00      
               re: this can have            01/01/70 00:00      
                  What I would do...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Very Low Frequency            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Give it a try...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List