Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
02/02/11 09:52
Read: times


 
#180962 - Incorrect analysis
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Send both the time stamp and the value on the serial port.

Then Labview will know if it should plot a specific sample at 13.04 or 13.05 seconds on the time axis.

You can't just send the measurement and assume that Labview should be able to figure out the exact time (with 0.01 second resolution and precision). The PC can't even guarantee that Labview will stop receiving characters for way longer than 0.01 before it gets reactivated and then finds multiple samples cached in the input buffer.

The only time you can ignore sending time stamps is if you send an initial time stamp (or absolute time isn't needed) and Labview knows the frequency so it can step the time. But you can never let Labview depend on the PC clock to figure out an absolute time based on when the data was received.

List of 40 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Transmitting a 100 Hz signal through 8051            01/01/70 00:00      
   What is your problem?            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: "the 8051 has transmission speed upto 19200"            01/01/70 00:00      
      the 8051 has transmission speed upto 19200            01/01/70 00:00      
         Incorrect analysis            01/01/70 00:00      
            Timing            01/01/70 00:00      
               Doesn't help to send at exact time - PC receive will jitter            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Windows For Sure Will...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  A Labview Limitation?            01/01/70 00:00      
         What makes you think that?            01/01/70 00:00      
            What makes you think that?            01/01/70 00:00      
               How fast are you sampling            01/01/70 00:00      
               Insufficient analysis            01/01/70 00:00      
                  20x            01/01/70 00:00      
         you can (I have) easily get 460kb.            01/01/70 00:00      
            No need to look for high baudrates            01/01/70 00:00      
               It doesn't help            01/01/70 00:00      
                  At least ...            01/01/70 00:00      
   Haven't you done this before...?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Here are the results in the form of images            01/01/70 00:00      
      Didn't bother to preview, did you?            01/01/70 00:00      
         How did you concluded?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Duplicate!            01/01/70 00:00      
         How did you concluded?            01/01/70 00:00      
            I think you're wrong            01/01/70 00:00      
            Looks close to 'as expected'            01/01/70 00:00      
               Seems like around 200Hz sample rate            01/01/70 00:00      
                  4 samples/period for the 50Hz signal            01/01/70 00:00      
            Not sure about your concept            01/01/70 00:00      
               Depends            01/01/70 00:00      
               Continuous monitoring?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Ambiguity            01/01/70 00:00      
   Displaying the Signal at real time            01/01/70 00:00      
      Still not mentioned what the problem is            01/01/70 00:00      
         I do not think they know the problem            01/01/70 00:00      
            A Ring Buffer ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               A double-buffered solution also possible            01/01/70 00:00      
            What is the Problem.            01/01/70 00:00      
         real RS232?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Huge FIFO in USB-to-serial adapter            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List