??? 09/13/10 12:05 Read: times |
#178545 - More care while finding solution Responding to: ???'s previous message |
And it would be almost trivial to create some drive mechanic that moves the card through your printer while you print a single line at a time.
Just think about the MTBF of your 240 pins. The relays takes more space than a transistor array. Focus on your problem. Don't jump twelve steps into one out of many possible solutions and take your fight there when you get stuck. The aim must be to find a good solution where you do not get stuck. Doing something many others have done can be a good way to go. The "many others" probably selected their solution based on experience and research. Going your own route means you must do that research. And you must locate the problematic issues and figure out good solutions for them before you go ahead and invest too much time with the solution. |
Topic | Author | Date |
I/O pin extension | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Start by specify your need | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you really have to list down the full requirements | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A suggestion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Specefic Requirements | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why relays? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
But dot matrix printers normally don't have X*Y array head | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Only need *one* column of dots! [ED] | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Head has constant speed w/o steps even with stepper motors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
reply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not helpful! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Necessity of relays | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Relays are not necessary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What's a "design"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Discrete or integrated | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
So what's the reason for a slow ctar-at-a-time head? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Printer Purpose | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Still no specific reason for a matrix! [Ed] | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
More care while finding solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: "many others" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Smaller than a relay | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Relays Take Drivers Too | 01/01/70 00:00 |