| ??? 09/13/10 04:49 Read: times |
#178532 - But dot matrix printers normally don't have X*Y array head Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Another thing about dot matrix printers is that they normally have one line of needles and sweeps the head. For very dense heads, the needles are arranged in a staggered pattern to allow the needles (or nozzles if ink-jet) to overlap.
But you normally don't build a 12x36 dot matrix printer. Depending on dot density in relation to needle size, the 36 needles forms one, two or three columns, and the careful timing in the software makes the staggered needles hit at the same location on the paper, which requires a delay corresponding to the movement speed of the head. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| I/O pin extension | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Start by specify your need | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you really have to list down the full requirements | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A suggestion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Specefic Requirements | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why relays? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But dot matrix printers normally don't have X*Y array head | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Only need *one* column of dots! [ED] | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Head has constant speed w/o steps even with stepper motors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not helpful! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Necessity of relays | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Relays are not necessary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What's a "design"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Discrete or integrated | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So what's the reason for a slow ctar-at-a-time head? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Printer Purpose | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still no specific reason for a matrix! [Ed] | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| More care while finding solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "many others" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Smaller than a relay | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Relays Take Drivers Too | 01/01/70 00:00 |