| ??? 09/13/10 06:04 Modified: 09/13/10 06:38 Read: times |
#178533 - Only need *one* column of dots! [ED] Responding to: ???'s previous message |
As Per said, you only need one column of dots!
Like this: 
See: http://www.mimech.com/printers/ http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl...k%3F&meta= But: Per Westermark said:
... careful timing in the software makes the staggered needles hit at the same location on the paper, which requires a delay corresponding to the movement speed of the head. I think it's better done by using stepping drive to move the head, rather than (just) software delays? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| I/O pin extension | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Start by specify your need | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you really have to list down the full requirements | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A suggestion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Specefic Requirements | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why relays? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But dot matrix printers normally don't have X*Y array head | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Only need *one* column of dots! [ED] | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Head has constant speed w/o steps even with stepper motors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not helpful! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Necessity of relays | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Relays are not necessary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What's a "design"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Discrete or integrated | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So what's the reason for a slow ctar-at-a-time head? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Printer Purpose | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still no specific reason for a matrix! [Ed] | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| More care while finding solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "many others" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Smaller than a relay | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Relays Take Drivers Too | 01/01/70 00:00 |