??? 09/13/10 09:35 Read: times Msg Score: +1 +1 Good Question |
#178541 - So what's the reason for a slow ctar-at-a-time head? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Note that a two-dimensional array of needles means that the needle have to be smaller than the center-center distance to the next needle - the coil used to drive the needle takes space too.
There should be an extremely important reason why someone would build a "character-at-a-time" printer head. It obviously isn't speed, since you claim 450ms speeds and thinks about driving the head with relays. So can you supply us with a good reason to go a route that costs a lot of money, time and sweat without any directly visible advantage? |
Topic | Author | Date |
I/O pin extension | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Start by specify your need | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you really have to list down the full requirements | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A suggestion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Specefic Requirements | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why relays? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
But dot matrix printers normally don't have X*Y array head | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Only need *one* column of dots! [ED] | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Head has constant speed w/o steps even with stepper motors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
reply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not helpful! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Necessity of relays | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Relays are not necessary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What's a "design"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Discrete or integrated | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
So what's the reason for a slow ctar-at-a-time head? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Printer Purpose | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Still no specific reason for a matrix! [Ed] | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
More care while finding solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: "many others" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Smaller than a relay | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Relays Take Drivers Too | 01/01/70 00:00 |