??? 01/05/10 21:41 Read: times |
#172184 - *EDIT* Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Actually, the frequency I was inputting was 1 KHz, I slowed it down to 10 Hz and 100 Hz and I'm now getting varying values straight out of the ADC. I will post my code here when I get a chance. Something must be wrong with my averaging technique. |
Topic | Author | Date |
ADuC816 Problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sample rate ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Isn't that exactly what you should get? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Indeed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
average of the repetitive peak ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Clarification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Signal Frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
magnitude | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Dump a number of samples to check | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
it is possible? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
fast sample-and-hold | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sorry, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
and | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
it won't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Undersampling often quite powerful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what is conclusion for OP? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How about precision rectification? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:ADUC816 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sure, you can | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Most cheaper digital scopes uses repetitive sampling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
how about | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SF=1 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Consistent not a simple subset of accurate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Dumping Values | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
*EDIT* | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Circuit![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |