Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
12/21/09 02:09
Read: times


 
#171807 - Clarification
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Yes, I'm sorry, I meant the Average of the repetitive peaks. I'm currently a student at university teaching myself microcontrollers.

I will have a DC offset of 2.5 V in my signal. the peak of the signal will never exceed 5 volts. Basically the chip samples at a max of 105.3 Hz based off the max sampling rate of the sinc^3 filter. I'm trying to sample over a long period of time as to be able to calculate the peak to peak voltage from my averaged 20 samples using this low sampling rate.

For some reason It always outputs the DC offset. On page 31 of the datasheet I noticed that the primary ADC averages before it outputs the data. Will this always output the DC shift? I'm just not sure if the problem is due to the chip taking the average, or if it should be able to handle this.

Datasheet: http://www.analog.com/static/im...DUC816.pdf

Thanks a lot for the quick responses!

List of 28 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
ADuC816 Problem            01/01/70 00:00      
   Sample rate ?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Isn't that exactly what you should get?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Indeed!            01/01/70 00:00      
         Hmm            01/01/70 00:00      
            average of the repetitive peak ?            01/01/70 00:00      
               Better            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Clarification            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Signal Frequency            01/01/70 00:00      
                        magnitude            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Dump a number of samples to check            01/01/70 00:00      
                        it is possible?            01/01/70 00:00      
                           fast sample-and-hold            01/01/70 00:00      
                              sorry, but            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 and            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    it won't            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Undersampling often quite powerful            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          what is conclusion for OP?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              How about precision rectification?            01/01/70 00:00      
   re:ADUC816            01/01/70 00:00      
      sure, you can            01/01/70 00:00      
      Most cheaper digital scopes uses repetitive sampling            01/01/70 00:00      
      how about            01/01/70 00:00      
         SF=1            01/01/70 00:00      
            Consistent not a simple subset of accurate            01/01/70 00:00      
               Dumping Values            01/01/70 00:00      
                  *EDIT*            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Circuit            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List