| ??? 12/20/09 21:34 Read: times |
#171801 - Indeed! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Stephen said:
...find the peak value of the voltage signal from this average. But, as Kai says, the whole point of taking an average is to get rid of peaks! If you want the peak value, then you must evaluate that before you do any averaging! Or perhaps we misunderstand, and you need to explain more clearly what you are actually trying to achieve...? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| ADuC816 Problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sample rate ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Isn't that exactly what you should get? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Indeed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| average of the repetitive peak ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Clarification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Signal Frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| magnitude | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dump a number of samples to check | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it is possible? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| fast sample-and-hold | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sorry, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it won't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Undersampling often quite powerful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what is conclusion for OP? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How about precision rectification? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:ADUC816 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure, you can | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Most cheaper digital scopes uses repetitive sampling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how about | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SF=1 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Consistent not a simple subset of accurate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dumping Values | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| *EDIT* | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Circuit | 01/01/70 00:00 |