| ??? 12/28/09 04:06 Read: times |
#171963 - SF=1 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Wouldn't setting SF=1 be the slowest rate it could have?
It does not have to be very accurate for the project, just has to be consistent. I'm also trying not to use any extra hardware if at all possible. Thanks for all the help! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| ADuC816 Problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sample rate ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Isn't that exactly what you should get? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Indeed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| average of the repetitive peak ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Clarification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Signal Frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| magnitude | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dump a number of samples to check | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it is possible? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| fast sample-and-hold | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sorry, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it won't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Undersampling often quite powerful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what is conclusion for OP? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How about precision rectification? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:ADUC816 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure, you can | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Most cheaper digital scopes uses repetitive sampling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how about | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SF=1 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Consistent not a simple subset of accurate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dumping Values | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| *EDIT* | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Circuit | 01/01/70 00:00 |