??? 12/21/09 20:26 Read: times |
#171839 - it won't Responding to: ???'s previous message |
with 100Hz samplerate, how Sample/Hold will helps to find peak in 106 Hz sinusoide ?
it won't, unless you employ an analog peak detector. To do it purely by a/d and logic the sample rate for just barely acceptable peak value need be 25 times the signal frequency. obviously if you have minutes to get the result, you can detect a constant peak value with a lower sample frequency Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
ADuC816 Problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sample rate ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Isn't that exactly what you should get? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Indeed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
average of the repetitive peak ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Clarification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Signal Frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
magnitude | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Dump a number of samples to check | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
it is possible? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
fast sample-and-hold | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sorry, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
and | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
it won't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Undersampling often quite powerful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what is conclusion for OP? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How about precision rectification? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:ADUC816 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sure, you can | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Most cheaper digital scopes uses repetitive sampling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
how about | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SF=1 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Consistent not a simple subset of accurate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Dumping Values | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
*EDIT* | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Circuit![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |