??? 06/14/13 09:44 Read: times Msg Score: +1 +1 Good Answer/Helpful |
#189937 - On Chip Debug is common Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jos� A. Ruiz said:
Erik Malund said:
PS why would you want your chip to suffer from Obsessive Compulsive Disorder? (google OCD) Oops! I thought I had seen the OCD acronym used in some datasheet or other :) It is commonly used. eg Atmel. Jos� A. Ruiz said:
Besides, I had not thought at all about the legal constraints placed on the IDE or the interface protocol. That alone is enough to discard any proprietary IDE -- the debugger would have to be built upon open standards and an open user interface, if it is built at all. Well, I'm glad I asked in this forum before I started working on this project, because I have to admit that the on-chip debugging wasn't a good idea :) On chip debug >is a good idea, you just need to choose the right path Perhaps try this : http://openocd.sourceforge.net/ ["Free and Open On-Chip Debugging, In-System Programming and Boundary-Scan Testing"] |
Topic | Author | Date |
OCD for FPGA core | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Serial-to-EC2 reverse engineering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
C2spec.pdf | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Reality Check...... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Agreed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
multi-threaded | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
FPGA and soft cores | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes ... but which debugger? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Actually no | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Who's "they" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I wouldn't use FPGA unless I need more than just the core | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
FPGA on-chip debugging redundant? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
debugging embedded processors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That's good to know. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
nice idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Von Neumann first | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if that were the case ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Poorly chosen acronym... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
On Chip Debug is common | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
On Chip Debug *is* a very good idea indeed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
PC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
PC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
PC | 01/01/70 00:00 |