| ??? 06/03/13 21:19 Modified: 06/03/13 21:20 Read: times |
#189854 - if that were the case ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
1) Does anybody have the documentation for SiLabs debugging protocol over RS-232?
if that were the case they would support illegal activity. I am confident that SILabs have developed this for use on their chips only Erik PS why would you want your chip to suffer from Obsessive Compulsive Disorder? (google OCD) |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| OCD for FPGA core | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Serial-to-EC2 reverse engineering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C2spec.pdf | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Reality Check...... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Agreed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| multi-threaded | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FPGA and soft cores | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes ... but which debugger? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Actually no | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Who's "they" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I wouldn't use FPGA unless I need more than just the core | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FPGA on-chip debugging redundant? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| debugging embedded processors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That's good to know. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| nice idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Von Neumann first | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if that were the case ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Poorly chosen acronym... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| On Chip Debug is common | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| On Chip Debug *is* a very good idea indeed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PC | 01/01/70 00:00 |