Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/07/13 20:50
Read: times


 
#189889 - I wouldn't use FPGA unless I need more than just the core
Responding to: ???'s previous message
The whole point, from where I sit, is to use the soft core to facilitate implementation of a function that's supported by other logic within the programmable device, which logic has to be implemented in programmable hardware. If there's a debugger that supports the MCU core, it probably doesn't support the unique features I've constructed in addition to that core. Since the entire device contains both the MCU and that custom logic, I'm curious how you debug the interactions between the custom hardware and the soft-core. In the past my own experience with this process has been limited to interactions between the logic and a soft-core provided by the FPGA manufacturer, hence, one that's supported by the F{GA mfg's tools.

I'm really curious how one should approach the situation wherein one has to debug what's going on in the code while interacting with the custom logic.

RE


List of 23 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
OCD for FPGA core            01/01/70 00:00      
   Serial-to-EC2 reverse engineering            01/01/70 00:00      
   C2spec.pdf            01/01/70 00:00      
   Reality Check......            01/01/70 00:00      
      Agreed            01/01/70 00:00      
         multi-threaded            01/01/70 00:00      
      FPGA and soft cores            01/01/70 00:00      
         Yes ... but which debugger?             01/01/70 00:00      
            Actually no            01/01/70 00:00      
               Who's "they"            01/01/70 00:00      
               I wouldn't use FPGA unless I need more than just the core            01/01/70 00:00      
                  FPGA on-chip debugging redundant?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  debugging embedded processors            01/01/70 00:00      
                     That's good to know.            01/01/70 00:00      
   nice idea            01/01/70 00:00      
      Von Neumann first            01/01/70 00:00      
   if that were the case ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Poorly chosen acronym...            01/01/70 00:00      
         On Chip Debug is common            01/01/70 00:00      
            On Chip Debug *is* a very good idea indeed!            01/01/70 00:00      
               PC            01/01/70 00:00      
                  PC            01/01/70 00:00      
                     PC            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List