??? 07/13/09 14:48 Modified: 07/13/09 14:49 Read: times Msg Score: -1 -1 Answer is Wrong |
#167184 - Although what you say is probably true ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
It's the FLASH implementation that's the disaster, and not the RC reset. After all, the RC reset served fine for ~20 years before FLASH was integrated with the 805x core.
Now, I'd freely admit that a positive-going RESET is the most utterly silly and poorly thought-out feature imaginable ... but that's another (Intel) story. RE |