Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/07/09 13:44
Read: times


 
#161360 - You need to consume power to be able to save power
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Yes, I agree with Andy.

You either have a chip that consumes power. Then it will heat up when run. That means that you will perform a long-time temperature-cycling of the chip.

Or you have a chip that consumes very little power. Then it will be close to the surounding temperatures with or without power. So you will not gain anything by cycling the power.

The problem with for example a high-end PC processor is that it can consume huge amounts of power at very low voltages. This means that it runs very hot while at the same time pushing very high currents through all connections. High currents at high temperatures may result in electro-migration, which results in ageing of the traces on the wafer.

But I don't believe that your chip is running at high currents.

List of 24 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Thermal stress reduction for IC            01/01/70 00:00      
   Ask the manufacturer!            01/01/70 00:00      
      Wear from temperature cycling            01/01/70 00:00      
      loose vs lose            01/01/70 00:00      
   What's the rated MTBF?            01/01/70 00:00      
      The temperature may rise            01/01/70 00:00      
         automotive grade is 125C            01/01/70 00:00      
            You should have mentioned 150C            01/01/70 00:00      
         Why does it rise?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Though its able            01/01/70 00:00      
               Sounds unlikely to me            01/01/70 00:00      
                  You need to consume power to be able to save power            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Why not having some numbers?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Power dissipation            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Not 1.4W at 85C but 1.2-0.24 = 0.96W            01/01/70 00:00      
                               figure 1.4W            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Reversed logic            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Agreed            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Answers            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    The webpage accepts            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Useful links...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Tjmax            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Please read the datasheet again, carefully!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Not Obsession only info            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List