| ??? 12/31/08 13:34 Read: times |
#161240 - You should have mentioned 150C Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
The temperature inside a closed automotive may rise above 85C
are you cheapskating and not using the correct grade? Erik Anyways I am working for Grade 3 (AECQ100). I mentioned 85C earlier ,but there could be chances of neglect that I fear. -Ap |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Thermal stress reduction for IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ask the manufacturer! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wear from temperature cycling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| loose vs lose | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What's the rated MTBF? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The temperature may rise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| automotive grade is 125C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You should have mentioned 150C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why does it rise? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Though its able | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sounds unlikely to me | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You need to consume power to be able to save power | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why not having some numbers? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Power dissipation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not 1.4W at 85C but 1.2-0.24 = 0.96W | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| figure 1.4W | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Reversed logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Agreed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Answers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The webpage accepts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Useful links... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Tjmax | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Please read the datasheet again, carefully! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not Obsession only info | 01/01/70 00:00 |