| ??? 04/03/07 18:23 Read: times |
#136522 - careless programming? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Careless programming, maybe, but not of those who produced the antivirus software. They did not follow decent rules, certainly, setting silent discard as a default rule (yeah, that's easy and cheap). But the main victim is the company, which deliberately violates every rules and standards written or not, at the same time in name of 'positive user experience' making sure that any crap can be made executable, regardless of the formatting... Of course: How could they have strict rules for headrr and content checking, if they cannot produce a correct mail header and content?!
Sorry for my rants... JW |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| a mystery our IT guy can not solve | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hyperactive spam filter on the ISP side ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| checked | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My mother has that problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Are you willing to experiment? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I, personally.am not, but muybe My IT guys and | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FTDI's dodgy mail server? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's Not Dodgy it is spam | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| tried that for 3 days | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| start at the source | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I do a lot of email-related stuff | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| my experience is... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sadly enough | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| one particular example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| mz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MZ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| :-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| careless programming? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reflecting "IT quality" on a company as a whole | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not IT, but M$ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
well, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reason found | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So much for RFC specs, eh? | 01/01/70 00:00 |