Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/30/07 16:30
Read: times


 
#136179 - Are you willing to experiment?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Can the sender try not using html content (note that I assume that this nasty )? Can the sender try an another mailing client? Perhaps something as lightweight as the Popcorn? Can they try modifying some of the fields in the sent mail (this requires experimenting with the settings of the sender's client)? Do the mails get lost if they are not Re to your address, but if the sender types in your address manually into a fresh new mail? Does ftdi append that stupid "confidentiality footer" or other automatic field into the text of mail?

Is the mail lost when sent to to anybody else in your domain? Into an other client of your ISP?

Are you willing to kick into @#$%^ anybody who is responsible for this? :-)

JW


PS. In the good old days, mails sent to wrong address got bounced.
I'd like to see the same treatment for spammers than the terrorsts..

List of 24 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
a mystery our IT guy can not solve            01/01/70 00:00      
   Hyperactive spam filter on the ISP side ?            01/01/70 00:00      
      checked            01/01/70 00:00      
         How ?            01/01/70 00:00      
         My mother has that problem            01/01/70 00:00      
   Are you willing to experiment?            01/01/70 00:00      
      I, personally.am not, but muybe My IT guys and            01/01/70 00:00      
   FTDI's dodgy mail server?            01/01/70 00:00      
      That's Not Dodgy it is spam            01/01/70 00:00      
         tried that for 3 days            01/01/70 00:00      
   start at the source            01/01/70 00:00      
      I do a lot of email-related stuff            01/01/70 00:00      
         my experience is...            01/01/70 00:00      
            sadly enough            01/01/70 00:00      
            one particular example            01/01/70 00:00      
               mz            01/01/70 00:00      
                  MZ            01/01/70 00:00      
                     :-)            01/01/70 00:00      
                        careless programming?            01/01/70 00:00      
                           reflecting "IT quality" on a company as a whole            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Not IT, but M$            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 well,            01/01/70 00:00      
   reason found            01/01/70 00:00      
      So much for RFC specs, eh?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List