??? 03/30/07 16:30 Read: times |
#136179 - Are you willing to experiment? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Can the sender try not using html content (note that I assume that this nasty )? Can the sender try an another mailing client? Perhaps something as lightweight as the Popcorn? Can they try modifying some of the fields in the sent mail (this requires experimenting with the settings of the sender's client)? Do the mails get lost if they are not Re to your address, but if the sender types in your address manually into a fresh new mail? Does ftdi append that stupid "confidentiality footer" or other automatic field into the text of mail?
Is the mail lost when sent to to anybody else in your domain? Into an other client of your ISP? Are you willing to kick into @#$%^ anybody who is responsible for this? :-) JW PS. In the good old days, mails sent to wrong address got bounced. I'd like to see the same treatment for spammers than the terrorsts.. |
Topic | Author | Date |
a mystery our IT guy can not solve | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hyperactive spam filter on the ISP side ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
checked | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
My mother has that problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Are you willing to experiment? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I, personally.am not, but muybe My IT guys and | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
FTDI's dodgy mail server? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That's Not Dodgy it is spam | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
tried that for 3 days | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
start at the source | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I do a lot of email-related stuff | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
my experience is... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sadly enough | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
one particular example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
mz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
MZ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
:-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
careless programming? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
reflecting "IT quality" on a company as a whole | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not IT, but M$ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
well, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
reason found | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
So much for RFC specs, eh? | 01/01/70 00:00 |