| ??? 11/09/06 14:17 Read: times |
#127651 - reversed argtument Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Closed source isn't going to deter anyone who really wants to manipulate the device. Quite a number of security holes are found without ever looking at the source code.
That argument is reversed. What I am stating is that the statement: "open source makes manipulation more difficult" is male cow manure. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| automated voting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think you fell off the rocker | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Huh? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| tamper and audit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Backwards | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| lack of relevance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not a problem for the real "bad guys" ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reversed argtument | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| electronic voting, a very very very bad idea. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you can read Schneier on security here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Automated voting - a good idea. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a paper trail and lots of sunlight ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Did you accidentally vote for Pat Buchannan? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If that were the case ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cute! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Often thought that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sadly, there's ample reason to agree ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think you are entirely missing the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I don't think that's necessary | 01/01/70 00:00 |