| ??? 11/09/06 13:30 Read: times |
#127644 - lack of relevance Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The evidence indicates that it's much harder to crack open source code than proprietary code. It has nothing to do with being able to examine the source, and has everything to do with designed in security, or lack thereof
"designed in security" has NOTHING to do with 'open' or 'closed' source. The method I would insist on, were I a purchase of voting machines would be that a mutually agreed organization sworn to secrecy would have access to the 'closed' source. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| automated voting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think you fell off the rocker | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Huh? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| tamper and audit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Backwards | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| lack of relevance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not a problem for the real "bad guys" ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reversed argtument | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| electronic voting, a very very very bad idea. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you can read Schneier on security here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Automated voting - a good idea. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a paper trail and lots of sunlight ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Did you accidentally vote for Pat Buchannan? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If that were the case ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cute! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Often thought that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sadly, there's ample reason to agree ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think you are entirely missing the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I don't think that's necessary | 01/01/70 00:00 |