??? 10/17/06 04:00 Read: times |
#126554 - digital filter approach? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jez Smith said:
The diagram is trying to show that the convolution function is the same as a digital filter but in a digital filter type structure you have the input being multiplied by a series of filter weights and summed,and the filter is in fact performing convolution,which is just a descreet form of integration.In the convolution coded output its like running the digital filter in reverse.
if you look here this is a good example of someone working though a design in software http://home.netcom.com/~chip.f/v...orial.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convolutional_code here shows in image one the convolutional coder with a shift register with output filter weights m1,m0,m-1 and the input being scaled by thease weights and summed.In fact it done give you the discrete impulse function of the convolutional encoder which if you know your z transforms you can then do a inverse transform to get the time domain version of the output. Jez, This makes me feel i need to learn more on the topic. I would start with it. But, i would also like to know whether the moore machine being derived for convolutional coding would be of any use. I ask this, since i found that it also performs the same logic of convolutionally coding the input data bits. So its going to be easy for me to arrive at the logic circuit or verilog code. So, can you let me know why its not enough to implement a convolutional coder by this method, and why you have given a digital filter approach? And Jez, You said you donno why you are so good to me. but i would say i wish, and even do my best to maintain it :) Regard's Suresh. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Viterbi Decoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Oh please........I give up. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Kids Today | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
And before you come back | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Link to Shannon's Paper | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ok.and i have... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
They dont write em like that anymore | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
See "Long Division" thread, this forum. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sorry i couldnt get you.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Just a cross-reference | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thats nicely said joe :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Full quote. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
WOW! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Another one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
As simple as i can make it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Convolutional coding | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yeah its not a good diagram..but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
digital filter approach? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yey!!!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The fact that its a moore machine is irrelevent | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I was.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Mealy vs Moore | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hello Jez., | 01/01/70 00:00 |