??? 01/17/13 10:08 Read: times |
#189219 - SST could be an option Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I requested some SST chip from Microchip that could be replacement of the NXP. They are cheaper but have lower performance than the Atmel single cycle core.
Some year ago I had to change to P89CV, but there arose an error, which was also in the AT89C51ED2 ( an AUXR bit was no reset at startup as in the previous versions ), then I bought some stock of the obsolete NXP P89C51RD2 to be sure. It is now in the errata, by resetting the bit at startup, the problem is solved. Jan, thanks for your help. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Reset issue with new Atmel AT89LP51ED2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Do never use a µC from which only a preliminary... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
configuration settings | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what about negative reset? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
good idea but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Some things to check... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
also try no LM810 at all | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
reset is inverted | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no strange signals | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Extra modes ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
pull-up on PSEN solves the problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
small capacitor ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
small capacitor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
side-stepping the problem? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SST could be an option | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
final status AT89LP51ED2 reset | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Clarifies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
loads on PSEN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
An isolated PSEN works fine ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
GAL causes problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ATF16V8CZ has Pin-keeper | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
'Z' indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ATF16V8BQL has Icc of ~1.5mA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
'BQL' version could be an option | 01/01/70 00:00 |