??? 01/17/13 08:34 Read: times |
#189213 - side-stepping the problem? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Koen De Ganck said: While it would be interesting to know the root of your problems (thus learn more about the new Atmel chips), you might be better off trying to use a different derivative. The P89V51RD2(Philips->NXP) = SST89E512(SST->Microchip) comes into mind...
The same board has been working fine with a P89C51RD2 since many years. JW |
Topic | Author | Date |
Reset issue with new Atmel AT89LP51ED2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Do never use a µC from which only a preliminary... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
configuration settings | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what about negative reset? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
good idea but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Some things to check... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
also try no LM810 at all | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
reset is inverted | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no strange signals | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Extra modes ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
pull-up on PSEN solves the problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
small capacitor ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
small capacitor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
side-stepping the problem? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SST could be an option | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
final status AT89LP51ED2 reset | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Clarifies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
loads on PSEN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
An isolated PSEN works fine ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
GAL causes problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ATF16V8CZ has Pin-keeper | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
'Z' indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ATF16V8BQL has Icc of ~1.5mA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
'BQL' version could be an option | 01/01/70 00:00 |