| ??? 01/16/13 13:56 Read: times |
#189190 - what about negative reset? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I know they claim compatibility, but as negative reset is the prevailing norm these days, what if Atmel did not really test the positive one?
Could you try to replace the xx810 for the complementary xx809 (and change the EA connection accordingly)? JW |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Reset issue with new Atmel AT89LP51ED2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Do never use a µC from which only a preliminary... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| configuration settings | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what about negative reset? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| good idea but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Some things to check... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| also try no LM810 at all | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reset is inverted | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no strange signals | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Extra modes ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| pull-up on PSEN solves the problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| small capacitor ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| small capacitor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| side-stepping the problem? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SST could be an option | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| final status AT89LP51ED2 reset | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Clarifies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| loads on PSEN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| An isolated PSEN works fine ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| GAL causes problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ATF16V8CZ has Pin-keeper | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 'Z' indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ATF16V8BQL has Icc of ~1.5mA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
'BQL' version could be an option | 01/01/70 00:00 |