Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
09/21/11 07:49
Read: times


 
#183825 - Not huge in size
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Richard said:
I doubt you'd consider a CPLD in a TQFP-80 or -100 package to be that "huge" nor are they particularly costly or difficult to use. Some FPGA's come in pretty small packages as well, though they tend to be BGA's, which have their own pitfalls.

Yes, of course they are available in fine pitch or in BGA. But if driving 64 external wires simultaneously, we would still be back to the original problem - it isn't easy to drive a ribbon cable. Especially if the other side have chips that shorts to ground if power is missing. Basically the same problem as having a 144-pin or 208-pin processor control the I/O signals directly.

The "huge" part is more the amount of pressure on a single chip to perform and survive - something dedicated bus driver chips are so much better at.

List of 40 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Bit-configurable transceiver chips            01/01/70 00:00      
   Suggesting....again...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Alas 5V needed and ribbon cables are a bit "rough"            01/01/70 00:00      
   Another Suggestion....            01/01/70 00:00      
   level translator            01/01/70 00:00      
      Alas, "weak output drive" and no input hysterese            01/01/70 00:00      
      TI sn74gtl2010            01/01/70 00:00      
         or NXP GTL2010,GTL2000            01/01/70 00:00      
            looks promising            01/01/70 00:00      
            NXP GTL20xx -> NVT20xx            01/01/70 00:00      
         Need to read more to understand them            01/01/70 00:00      
            looks like the cat's miauw            01/01/70 00:00      
   NXP has ....            01/01/70 00:00      
      I2C or SPI just can't get even close to the huge bandwidth            01/01/70 00:00      
         nope, no I²C clocks            01/01/70 00:00      
            extender, not expander            01/01/70 00:00      
   I have been wondering this myself            01/01/70 00:00      
      Supported capacitance seems to be the snag            01/01/70 00:00      
   Differential SPI            01/01/70 00:00      
      Serial -> buffers on adapter boards is a potential solution            01/01/70 00:00      
   Have you considered programmable logic?            01/01/70 00:00      
      I had suggested this as well            01/01/70 00:00      
         Yes ... I remember that ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            Long life            01/01/70 00:00      
               They seem to live a long time ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Adapters            01/01/70 00:00      
                     These aren't necessarily so "huge"            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Not huge in size            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Some of them can handle that.            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Yes and no            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 There are ways ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Body diodes            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       serial termination ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Yes, current- and bandwidth-limiting components used            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             you youing whippersnappers, pay attention            01/01/70 00:00      
            pedantry, again            01/01/70 00:00      
               What would YOU suggest?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Here's a thought ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Probably            01/01/70 00:00      
         I'd sugest you consider older CPLD's            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List