Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
10/27/10 17:57
Read: times


 		 #179375 - Don't try to redefine the purposes of old posts.
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Justin said:
You do have stock of the 232A. Is it suitable to place the 232A in place of the 232 for the time being without replacing the capacitors? That is the reason for this discussion.

Not at all - or you have made a seriously bad point of trying to tell us that you have decided to start such a subdiscussion. The discussion that have been ongoing is if it is worse to go further and further from the component values specified in datasheets.

But back to your, just started, subtopic:

On one hand, Maxim may have specific reasons for supporting 1uF with MAX232A without having a reason to support 10uF with a MAX232 just because of the special case with field repairs etc. What compatibility reason would Maxim have for supporting 10uF?

On the other hand, Maxim do have partial documentation about using some of the 0.1uF transceivers with 1uF capacitors. No documentation about using them with higher capacitances than 1uF.

List of 40 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
need help getting started with AT89S52            01/01/70 00:00      
   Buy programming "cable" from Atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
      Is it Parallel Port given in there            01/01/70 00:00      
         Wrong path            01/01/70 00:00      
            path suggestions            01/01/70 00:00      
               using P89V51RD2            01/01/70 00:00      
                  FlashMagic            01/01/70 00:00      
         Make it happen...            01/01/70 00:00      
            have a look at this one            01/01/70 00:00      
         COM1 will do            01/01/70 00:00      
            ISP circuit for P89v51rd2            01/01/70 00:00      
               not informative            01/01/70 00:00      
                  how about this one            01/01/70 00:00      
                     how about where are the capacitors            01/01/70 00:00      
                        about deviation from topic            01/01/70 00:00      
                           not useable            01/01/70 00:00      
                              wiht names for pins of caps            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Chat forum            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Use correct capacitor values.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    more wrong caps            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       capacitor values            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          what about the plug??            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             i dont get you            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                no - maybe            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       What is worse?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          The main objective of communications            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             reasons for not using max 233            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Cost?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Well, I search for you and I found...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          this            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             errors from over-filtering?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             it's a linear error?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Don't introduce "linear" in the equation            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   The original question was not answered            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      'worse' is not an absolute word            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         It's not ridiculous            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                            Don't try to redefine the purposes of old posts.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      Still no linearity claimed. Just "more out of spec bader"            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         Not obvious            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                            I agree            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List