??? 05/29/10 11:04 Read: times |
#176283 - Useful ideas - but I don't want to change the hardware Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Michael,
Thanks for these useful guidelines. I can see the benefit of the "receive always on" approach that you suggest - however I don't want to change the hardware if I can avoid it because there are hundreds of these systems out in the field. So I'd like to come up with the most reliable, bullet-proof way of driving the bus with /RE and DE connected together and to my port pin. Here's what I've got at present (this just echoes all characters received):
Yes, I know that the best way to do it is with interrupts! I will move on to that when I've got this working perfectly... Thanks - Rowan |
Topic | Author | Date |
Receiving serial bytes on 80C320 UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks - excellent FAQ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
"bible time" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Truly biblical! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
My recommendation... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Useful ideas - but I don't want to change the hardware | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You are absolutotally unconditionally confused | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
!RI or /RE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'll re-answer the post above | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Use previous advice and keep receiver enabled | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
This can't be right... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How to get it working | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sometimes right, sometimes wrong | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
e-mailed to Steve, Craig --- forum FYI | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
We're getting there... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I believe you are corect.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
join the club | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
"No other way??" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
in my (personal) opinion![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what is "other code" ? | 01/01/70 00:00 |