Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
12/28/09 23:12
Modified:
  12/28/09 23:13
Read: times


 		 #171999 - There's a reason why it doesn't say that ...
Responding to: ???'s previous message
It's that the load is an asynchronous function. You should, in fact, take pains to ensure that you don't clock the device while load is active, or load the device too close to either edge of a clock pulse, as you may create undesired effects.

I'd time my load pulse so that it begins while the clock is low, and ends while it is still low. After all, you'll not be operating at breakneck speed.

RE


List of 31 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
74HC165            01/01/70 00:00      
   Document your code            01/01/70 00:00      
      pen and paper            01/01/70 00:00      
         It's still illegible!            01/01/70 00:00      
            code arranged            01/01/70 00:00      
         Why not format your code?            01/01/70 00:00      
            formatted code            01/01/70 00:00      
   Indentation is very Important            01/01/70 00:00      
      "Insert Program Code" Button            01/01/70 00:00      
   what are the expectations...            01/01/70 00:00      
      and the problem is...            01/01/70 00:00      
         your code is ambiguous            01/01/70 00:00      
            succes...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Pen and paper really is a good method            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Thanks & a weird point...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Not Weird At All            01/01/70 00:00      
                        load pulse timing            01/01/70 00:00      
                           There's a reason why it doesn't say that ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Load Not Triggering a Shift Cycle            01/01/70 00:00      
            Working new code part            01/01/70 00:00      
   I think this may help            01/01/70 00:00      
      Same Problem OP First Had            01/01/70 00:00      
         Responding to: Michael            01/01/70 00:00      
            look at a logic diagram of the '165            01/01/70 00:00      
            Oh dear...            01/01/70 00:00      
               To Kai            01/01/70 00:00      
                  No, it never worked!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     try it            01/01/70 00:00      
                        No, the code will destroy the chips...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Responding to: Kai Klaas's previous message            01/01/70 00:00      
            Responding to: Sherif            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List