| ??? 11/09/09 19:27 Read: times |
#170605 - Maybe no PC? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
Joe Gold said:NXP support only profesional programmers using ICP and they don' want to enter in to technical support issues with end developer.
And this is completely idiotic. This completely negates the point of ISP, or whatever they call it. I beg to differ. the circuitry is documented and the PC software to connect to said circuitry is free, why do you need more? Erik Maybe the ability to program without the use of a PC? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| reprogramming SM894051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Link? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reprogramming SM894051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if you can't find the manufacturers website ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh, come on! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The Datasheet says | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think so too but it doesn't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Unfortunately | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ISP does not mean it's public | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| HUH? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why splitting hair? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| IPC for the LPC900 doc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and this is idiotic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Majority requests probably not affected by datasheet quality | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i beg to differ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe no PC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| writing to flash ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| empty chip too? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ICP is not (officially) documented | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ICP and support | 01/01/70 00:00 |