| ??? 11/09/09 19:22 Modified: 11/09/09 19:28 Read: times |
#170604 - i beg to differ Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Joe Gold said:NXP support only profesional programmers using ICP and they don' want to enter in to technical support issues with end developer.
And this is completely idiotic. This completely negates the point of ISP, or whatever they call it. I beg to differ. the circuitry for ISP is documented and the PC software to connect to said circuitry is free, why do you need more? There has been oodles and bunches of posts "why does my circuitry not work" which all have related to 'subsititutions by the ignorant', how many posts and calls to NXP support would you expect if NXP let the ignorant play with the record format? Now you could say something like "(the) NXP (person) knows me and know that I can work with it without overloading the support people" then what would be the reaction from the people that were denied? we all know that the person that in his/her own opinion is the "most knowledgeable" 0ften is anything but. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| reprogramming SM894051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Link? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reprogramming SM894051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if you can't find the manufacturers website ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh, come on! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The Datasheet says | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think so too but it doesn't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Unfortunately | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ISP does not mean it's public | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| HUH? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why splitting hair? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| IPC for the LPC900 doc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and this is idiotic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Majority requests probably not affected by datasheet quality | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i beg to differ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe no PC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| writing to flash ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| empty chip too? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ICP is not (officially) documented | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ICP and support | 01/01/70 00:00 |