??? 11/08/09 07:47 Read: times |
#170565 - Unfortunately Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I think chip makers nowadays tend to release the full programming specs only to qualified bona fide programmer manufacturers.
For those that want to program chips themselves, there's plenty with ISP. Rick Cyin said:
if that is case I will stick to AT89c4051 for few bucks. Yes, I think that's the best idea! |
Topic | Author | Date |
reprogramming SM894051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Link? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
reprogramming SM894051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if you can't find the manufacturers website ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Oh, come on! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The Datasheet says | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I think so too but it doesn't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Unfortunately | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ISP does not mean it's public | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
HUH? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why splitting hair? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
IPC for the LPC900 doc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
and this is idiotic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Majority requests probably not affected by datasheet quality | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
i beg to differ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Maybe no PC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
writing to flash ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
empty chip too? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ICP is not (officially) documented | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ICP and support![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |