Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
09/30/09 07:36
Read: times


 		 #169294 - It's not quite the same with part numbers
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Per Westermark said:
Richard Erlacher said:
The "AT" tells us it's from Atmel. I'd say that's sufficient. Does anyone else label his parts AT89C51?

RE

The issue wasn't "sufficient". It was a response to "the full name of the chip is at89c51". Your name may be Richard, but is your full name Richard?


I have to agree, there's more to the complete "name" than just the part number. After all, there's a package designation, which also was omitted, even in your correction. I'd say the package designation and perhaps the speed grade is more important than the manufacturer's name, since the manufacturer is implicit in the "AT" of the AT89C51.

RE


List of 38 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
C# compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
   Not C#            01/01/70 00:00      
      thank very much            01/01/70 00:00      
      another question            01/01/70 00:00      
         the same answer            01/01/70 00:00      
         if you compare datasheets, instruction set ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            Are you teasing, Richard?            01/01/70 00:00      
               My point, exactly!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  He is a beginner            01/01/70 00:00      
                     He needs to understand the tools            01/01/70 00:00      
                        When all you have is a hammer            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Does the 8052 meet his needs?            01/01/70 00:00      
   a comment, not a 'bashing'            01/01/70 00:00      
      Probably too detailed?            01/01/70 00:00      
         C#            01/01/70 00:00      
            Hmmmm ... JAVA for 8-bitters?            01/01/70 00:00      
               It exists            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I don't doubt it for a minute!            01/01/70 00:00      
            Windows not (necessarily) required            01/01/70 00:00      
               I stand Corrected            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I wonder how it compares to C++            01/01/70 00:00      
   another update            01/01/70 00:00      
      No            01/01/70 00:00      
         Lucky this time?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Sufficient: probably. Complete: no            01/01/70 00:00      
               it's probably sufficient to say you drive a volvo            01/01/70 00:00      
                  You sure?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Yes, but just name Volvo says it all ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  It's probably best not to mention that you drive a Volvo            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Well, I don't ... I drive a Nissan Maxima            01/01/70 00:00      
                        [UK] "Volvo Drivers"            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Have to consider getting the book            01/01/70 00:00      
         Give the guy a break!            01/01/70 00:00      
            Not the issue            01/01/70 00:00      
               It's not quite the same with part numbers            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Not necessarily true, though?            01/01/70 00:00      
      the full name of the chip is at89c51            01/01/70 00:00      
   Is this thread now finished?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List