| ??? 08/17/05 19:55 Modified: 08/17/05 19:56 Read: times |
#99589 - do you want to do everything for your ow Responding to: ???'s previous message |
So in absence of other evidence than that the author obviously knows what does he do, you reject all projects which are not yours?
How can you then rely on anybody else's product? How can you for example rely on the C compiler you are using every day? Where is the eveidence of its functionality? What kind of scrutiny do you require for a gadged designed for an undemanding application to stop rejecting it from the start? Jan Waclawek PS. Craig, please, couldn't you move the irrelevant part of this to the chatboard? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| The problem here is that some unsuspecti | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| promoting? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if you do not care if it fails, why even | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Of course | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You got run over in the parking lot, it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| presumption of innocence | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| negative argument | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Millions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the old joke | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| do you want to do everything for your ow | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I will reject everything that does not a | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| standards and rejections | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but that is enough to ruin you | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why discussing bit bang | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
according to... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| insane and unreliable | 01/01/70 00:00 |