| ??? 08/17/05 19:43 Read: times |
#99586 - presumption of innocence Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Let's put aside known bad designs, for this case let me state this:
Until one proves a design is prone to fail, it shall be considered correct. I have seen no evidence of possible failure of the bit-banged USB gadget I gave the link to, except the AT90S2313 overclocking, which a.) was clearly stated in the description; b.) is today irrelevant due to the fact that AT90S2313 is obsolete and the replacement ATTiny2313 is rated 20MHz. Jan Waclawek |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| The problem here is that some unsuspecti | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| promoting? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if you do not care if it fails, why even | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Of course | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You got run over in the parking lot, it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| presumption of innocence | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| negative argument | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Millions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the old joke | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| do you want to do everything for your ow | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I will reject everything that does not a | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| standards and rejections | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but that is enough to ruin you | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why discussing bit bang | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
according to... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| insane and unreliable | 01/01/70 00:00 |