| ??? 06/05/10 14:08 Read: times |
#176421 - I agree... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I agree with everything all of you have said and as it stands we will probably follow Erik's or Andy's suggestion.
We are a small organization and I have always tried use ISO to prevent us from taking shortcuts that would compromise the reproducibilty of a product despite all the pettiness and lack of understanding by the auditors. It is easy enough to cater to the letter of the law and bypass the intention as you have suggested, but this conundrum must have come up in many other instances and I was wondering if anyone had a genuine solution as to how to test a tester. -Aubrey |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| test the test jig | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| only ISO believes ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "Calibration" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ISO9000, concepts and lies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| doghouse and flagpole | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I agree... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use loopback and stimuli | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "Design For Test" (DFT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You can not ask us | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No silver bullet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Calibrations... NIST traceability.... fun | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That is what traceable means | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Should be few steps to a national reference | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Article on the topic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Test the test harness | 01/01/70 00:00 |