??? 06/04/10 22:57 Read: times |
#176402 - doghouse and flagpole Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The certification/revision etc. process. The inspectors don't understand the previous two points; they have no chance to judge whether the first or second is achieved. They are interested in the details they are able to check, and in fact one of the key things is to prepare them a set of testable details.
"doghouse and flagpole" is a Danish expression for someone(s) checking something they have no idea of. The origin of the expression comes from a comittee checking the budget for building a multimillion (or was that billion) nucler research station only having reason to question the price of the doghouse and the flagpole. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
test the test jig | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
only ISO believes ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
"Calibration" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ISO9000, concepts and lies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
doghouse and flagpole | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I agree... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Use loopback and stimuli | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
"Design For Test" (DFT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You can not ask us | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No silver bullet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Calibrations... NIST traceability.... fun | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That is what traceable means | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Should be few steps to a national reference | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Article on the topic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Test the test harness | 01/01/70 00:00 |