| ??? 03/27/09 15:00 Read: times |
#163911 - Character time Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Richard Erlacher said:
using character time Andy Neil said:
There's an idea; hadn't thought of that one - thanks! Jan Waclawek said:
Can you please elaborate? Well, Richard might have to explain what he was actually thinking, but my take was: Most of the baud rates are well-separated - mostly by a factor of 2 - so it should be possible to look at how long the response took, and take a guess at its speed from that. This does, of course, assume that you can get suitably precises timing - which may require some extra pin(s)... |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Autobaud - the other end... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Doh | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Eh? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Homing in | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Considerations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How does it respond to AT? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The proper response to "AT" is "OK" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no absolutely perfect solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Character time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Go for KISS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| only be needed once after a modem change. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Some ARM7's have Autobaud detect | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No - the *other* end! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Fall back and forward | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Only interested in local DTE-DCE speed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You were clear | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Start slow, or start fast...? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Unnecessarily high? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| High baudrate = bursty | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Throughtput | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keep Up? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Keeping up always hard at high baudrates | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| KISS? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A Cunning Plan... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Timing | 01/01/70 00:00 |