| ??? 10/27/08 10:05 Read: times |
#159380 - Oh the irony. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I would have assumed a EEPROM manufacturer to have known better.
It's a ST M93C56, so really nothing all that special. With modem or radio chips, it could be assumed that they have most of their knowledge within the analog side, Ironically, the uC was from Analog Devices. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| SPI is a free for all ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Danger to use block sizes not n*8 bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The non-standard, standard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Master is easy, slave is pure hell | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| control by chip select | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Correct | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Now you know why Philips (now NXP) ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What was the incompatibility? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Instruction length. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bad knowledge of that EEPROM manufacturer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh the irony. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No Analogue Irony At All | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have company.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Your T7 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Simple interpretation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FTDI | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I have company | 01/01/70 00:00 |