| ??? 10/27/08 10:03 Read: times |
#159379 - Bad knowledge of that EEPROM manufacturer Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I would have assumed a EEPROM manufacturer to have known better.
I thought it was only some modem chips, radio devices, FPGA etc that could be found with stupid transfer lengths. An EEPROM should have been developed by someone with a good working knowledge of microprocessors (from more than one manufacturer and from more than one family). With modem or radio chips, it could be assumed that they have most of their knowledge within the analog side, or within signal analysis. But a memory chip is so very closely connected to microprocessors (even if some other chips, such as radio receivers etc has an SPI or I2C interface for a EEPROM memory). |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| SPI is a free for all ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Danger to use block sizes not n*8 bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The non-standard, standard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Master is easy, slave is pure hell | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| control by chip select | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Correct | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Now you know why Philips (now NXP) ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What was the incompatibility? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Instruction length. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bad knowledge of that EEPROM manufacturer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh the irony. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No Analogue Irony At All | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have company.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Your T7 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Simple interpretation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FTDI | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I have company | 01/01/70 00:00 |