??? 10/08/08 13:26 Modified: 10/08/08 13:29 Read: times |
#158930 - Design. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Stefan Kanev said:
Not that costly , will study its datasheet , thanks for the DDS idea . Richard Erlacher said:
http://www.elecfree.com/circuit/O...y-ic-1458/
It's not a single IC, but it's a starting point, if you want to "roll-yer-own." IIRC, the 8038 has a large switching transient at dv/dt=0, and I doubt this circuit will be very different in that respect. There's also XR2206 and XR2207, but I suspect they're no more available than XR8038. RE Richard the circuit will need lots of modification .Is there any crystal controlled sine wave generator schematic you have gone by in time? Steve M. Taylor said:
Ap Charles said:
I dont have experience with wein bridge oscillator with op amps. Any recommendations schematics/ site ,I need high amplitude stability as I am going to excite an RVDT . We have precision, very low distortion oscillators for exactly that application Ap, I can send you some circuit diagrams. We measure the CURRENT in the LVDT, which is a more accurate method of stabilising the reference levels than a voltage. Our favourite method uses a Colpitts oscillator as the signal source. That needs a tiny transformer, but you can use any oscillator topology you like, provided you can readily control its amplitude. If you use a DDS chip, you still need to get precision amplitude, so you could feed a dds with a reference, and use the same reference for the A/D circuits after the demodulation. Steve Steve yes please mail me the circuit , that will be helpful . I dont know much regarding the DDS , will revert back after studying the datasheet. Regards/ Ap |
Topic | Author | Date |
Function Generator IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Better? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Maxim | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Maxim unavailable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
DDS? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Better? .5% -1% THD with discrete solution? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Wein bridge? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Simple wont do ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
LVDT driving | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
High performance can be simple | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Tuning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
DDS again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Design. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What frequency? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Err | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
DDS again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
THD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
THD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
reference | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, but at what cost? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
About 4 bucks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Better? In what way? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
6 dollars | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Gee ... That isn't so bad! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Tuning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hand-tuning is not cheap! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Drift | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
how does drift impact the manpower requirement? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Notes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Amplitude , tempco | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Precision | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Precision ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
at that rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
to Steve | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
LVDT | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
power/energy meter IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
energy meter IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
at that rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Filtering? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It will remove SOME of the distortion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
have you seen this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I am afraid | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Simple` | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
DTMF Genarator | 01/01/70 00:00 |