Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
08/16/08 19:56
Read: times


 
#157514 - P-Channel Enhancement Mode Better
Responding to: ???'s previous message
For the diagram in the original posting by Koosha the switch is shown in the VCC line of the target MCU. For switching the power in this type of circuit a P-Channel Enhancement Mode FET would be a far better choice as shown below:



A suitable part may be the FDC638 from Fairchild. The data sheet is here: FDC638

The reason a P-Channel part is suitable here is that the part can become fully ON when the Gate is pulled toward GND by the output pin of the main MCU. This applies a VGS of nearly 5V to the FET and can ensure that the suggested part is turned on to a very low RDS.

If an N-Channel FET is chosen, as suggested by Mr Erlacher, it is necessary to provide a gate drive voltage well above the +5V level to ensure that the device is fully powered on if the switch is placed in the VCC line of the target MCU. Now while this is possible if you have a higher voltage source available it is also then necessary to provide an additional stage of circuitry between the MCU output and the n-FET gate drive so that the output is not exposed to voltages over the VCC level of the master MCU.

Michael Karas






List of 15 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
How to turn on/off another MCU            01/01/70 00:00      
   Low-power mode?            01/01/70 00:00      
      not a power consumption issue            01/01/70 00:00      
         correction            01/01/70 00:00      
   Logic MOSFET            01/01/70 00:00      
      P-Channel Enhancement Mode Better            01/01/70 00:00      
         that's why they make logic MOSFET's            01/01/70 00:00      
            Makes No Difference            01/01/70 00:00      
               Perhaps you should try a logic-MOSFET            01/01/70 00:00      
   It Still Makes No Difference            01/01/70 00:00      
      Maybe it's the load current            01/01/70 00:00      
         Richard...........................            01/01/70 00:00      
            I wouldn't say that ...            01/01/70 00:00      
   possibly simpler idea            01/01/70 00:00      
   Thank you all,            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List