Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
12/21/07 17:01
Modified:
  12/21/07 18:07

Read: times


 
#148593 - TTL Compatibility
Responding to: ???'s previous message
I did a search on "TTL Compatibility." I am redesigning an old circuit because the part it was built around is no longer available. The data sheet for the new part I am using, a High Speed CMOS SRAM, states that all inputs are TTL Compatible, which implies to me that other items on the bus can use 5V TTL logic. But then the data sheet states that Vih Max (hi input voltage) is Vdd + 0.3V. My concern is that TTL Compatible may not mean what I take it to mean, so I came here to see if I could learn anything.

I didn't find anything from any of the returned threads.

One of the returned posts was
http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=37908

The subject for that post is "other compatibility problem"

Here is the text of that post.
The thing here is not that I don't like to solve problems. But as you know, problems require to be solved always when there's little or no time for it. Secondly, our regular supplier may have created the biggest problem here as he sold me the uC's as 1-to-1 replacement for the - discontinued - 89C51RC+. Next thing to do obviously is to use an RC2 without the 'H', but so far it took me half a day to come to that bloody conclusion.


Can you tell yet, why that post was returned? Obviously the word "compatibility" is right there in the subject. But it never mentions TTL. Look again, and see why it returned.

The thing here is not that I don't like to solve problems. But as you know, problems require to be solved always when there's little or no time for it. Secondly, our regular supplier may have created the biggest problem here as he sold me the uC's as 1-to-1 replacement for the - discontinued - 89C51RC+. Next thing to do obviously is to use an RC2 without the 'H', but so far it took me half a day to come to that bloody conclusion.


Did you spot it this time?

Now, I am not suggesting that Craig take time out of his life to make this search function any better. But I think there might be a good argument for us to be just a bit more patient before handing out any of those "Didn't Search First" scores.

Just a thought.

Joe

P.S. I was right. When ISSI writes "TTL Compatible," they are not talking about the I/O logic levels. Better learned now than after parts are bought and boards are built.

List of 19 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
about that SEARCH feature            01/01/70 00:00      
   it's the choice of the proper keywords            01/01/70 00:00      
   ampersand            01/01/70 00:00      
   No            01/01/70 00:00      
      Maybe, but if they tried it last time ...            01/01/70 00:00      
   Search facility            01/01/70 00:00      
      maybe it's the other way around            01/01/70 00:00      
         Common problem            01/01/70 00:00      
      a q'n'd fix suggestion...            01/01/70 00:00      
      How is the search string interpreted?            01/01/70 00:00      
         a few things found out by experimenting...            01/01/70 00:00      
            You\'re right            01/01/70 00:00      
               There may be more to this than meets the eye!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Use quotes to search for a phrase            01/01/70 00:00      
               made it a FAQ            01/01/70 00:00      
   Google, temporarily            01/01/70 00:00      
      That should work ... but ...            01/01/70 00:00      
   TTL Compatibility            01/01/70 00:00      
      There are two separate issues            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List