??? 11/25/07 20:45 Read: times |
#147382 - about that SEARCH feature |
I stumbled across my old copy of K&R and recall a thread some time ago in which someone was curious about something supposed to be contained in it. I couldn't recall the title of the thread in question, so I tried something ... I searched for <K&R>, among other things, and found that, in the K&R case, I had 800+ hits yet not one of the first few "hits" had an occurrence of the search term.
Do you suppose that explains why so few people use that search tool prior to posting? RE |
Topic | Author | Date |
about that SEARCH feature | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
it's the choice of the proper keywords | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ampersand | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Maybe, but if they tried it last time ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Search facility | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
maybe it's the other way around | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Common problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
a q'n'd fix suggestion... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How is the search string interpreted? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
a few things found out by experimenting... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You\'re right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
There may be more to this than meets the eye! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Use quotes to search for a phrase | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
made it a FAQ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Google, temporarily | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That should work ... but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
TTL Compatibility | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
There are two separate issues | 01/01/70 00:00 |