| ??? 11/26/07 16:10 Read: times |
#147414 - Maybe, but if they tried it last time ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I've consistently found more irrelevant "hits" returned by the search tool than relevant ones. I know search is a difficult thing in a forum like this one, where people frequently use titles totally irrelevant to the subject of their post, e.g. "HELP ME", etc. However, if enter a query of LCD, I expect every "hit" to contain the search term. As soon as it fails that test, it's useless, and I probably will not consider it "next time." Maybe it would be helpful for the search result to highlight the search term, as some www search engines do.
RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| about that SEARCH feature | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's the choice of the proper keywords | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ampersand | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe, but if they tried it last time ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Search facility | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| maybe it's the other way around | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Common problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a q'n'd fix suggestion... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How is the search string interpreted? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a few things found out by experimenting... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You\'re right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There may be more to this than meets the eye! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use quotes to search for a phrase | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| made it a FAQ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Google, temporarily | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That should work ... but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| TTL Compatibility | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
There are two separate issues | 01/01/70 00:00 |